During our measurements, no software was open apart from the web browser itself.
CHROME VS SAFARI VS FIREFOX MAC PORTABLE
To carry out our tests, we used a portable machine, a Surface Laptop Go under Windows 11 (21H2 build 22000.376), equipped with 16 GB RAM and powered by an Intel Core i5 1035G1 CPU at 1 GHz. These benchmarks, which only measure the raw performance of each, allow you to get a fairly concrete idea of the speed of each of them, whether they are used on Windows or on macOS. However, Chrome, Firefox and Edge, also available on the Apple OS, also have their public, and fervent defenders.Īpart from the functionality aspect, are the performances of the main browsers on the market all similar depending on the OS? If they obviously differ according to the number of open tabs, the power of the machine and the tasks that are carried out there, we decided to subject the browsers most commonly used on Windows and macOS to a series of tests simulating uses currents. On macOS, purists usually only have eyes for Safari, Apple’s web browser, reputed to be the most capable on the platform. And even if the methods used by Microsoft to impose it as the default browser on Windows are questionable, it is clear that it has become very effective and can compete without blushing with Chrome. As for Edge, Microsoft’s web browser has long been the unloved, before making a meteoric reassembled with the public after switching to Chromium, the browser open-source of Google on which Chrome is based. On Windows, Chrome is beloved by users for its perfect integration with Google’s ecosystem, which has now become difficult to circumvent.įirefox is appreciated for its semblance of independence and for its many privacy protection features.
Each of them offers features that are specific to them and that are enough to seduce users to comfort them in their choice. Generally, the choice that takes place between the various players in the market more often depends on the affinities and habits of each. Choosing a web browser is not an exact science.
0 kommentar(er)
